Hi Cedric,
Actually - from what I can see in the log - the repository should be
registered with RMI:
24.04.2006 10:19:22 *INFO * RepositoryStartupServlet: Repository
bound via RMI with name: //localhost:1099/jackrabbit.repository
(RepositoryStartupServlet.java, line 475)
The log entry for the dump is only informative as the repository startup
servlet tries to create an RMI registry first and falls back to
connecting to an existing registry if creation fails. Therefore failure
to create the registry is not an error. The next entry though is
actually, what you are looking for: The confirmation, that from the
point of view of the startup servlet, the repository should be
registered under the logged URL.
Regards
Felix
Cedric Bosdonnat schrieb:
Hi Felix,
Thank you for your quick answer :)
Felix Meschberger a écrit :
Some questions to check what I might do wrong:
+ What is the default port used for RMI ?
The default RMI port in a Java VM is 1099
That's what I thought...
+ is the //localhost/jackrabbit.repository url correct ?
No, the default configuration would be for port 1099, that is
//localhost:1099/jackrabbit.repository
Ok... thus omitting the port won't choose the default one ? nevermind...
+ is there something else to add ?
Considering, you might not have used the correct port, this might be
your issue. Else, I cannot tell without logs.
I added the logs of the jackrabbit servlet startup here:
http://pastebin.com/678426
It seems like the port 1099 is busy... but netstat -a doesn't show me
this port as active... I even try to change the port, but I still get
the same exception: "Port already used".
I didn't found them at first look because the log4j line for the file
appender was commented (default option :().
Thanks for your help,
Cedric
