Hi,

I am actually paid by my company to write a content repository scalable on
100 machines with fault tolerance. We were thinking of extending Jackrabbit
(everything would be committed back to Jackrabbit after). I am interested in
extending your solutions if it suits our needs.

Where can I find more information on what you built?

We are just starting the project and still in the requirements phase. (This
project is for my master's thesis.).

Nico
my blog! http://www.deviant-abstraction.net !!

On 7/11/06, Thomas Heute <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


I would not recommend to start yet another project, you can simply change
the
persistence manager.
The way we do it, is by using a singleton service with a distributed cache
using a Hibernate persistent manager.

If you are willing to improve our solution and serious about it feel free
to
contact me. (We would need to decouple it from our portal implementation
first but this would not be hard since they are not highly coupled)

Thomas.

On Monday 10 July 2006 18:07, Sten R. Sandvik wrote:
> Hi all.
>
>
>
> I must first say that Jackrabbit and JSR 170 is sure fun to work with.
> But my professional experience so far is that Jackrabbit is not really
> suited for large scale applications. Two features that the enterprise
> market needs is clustering and online-backup support. I am therefore
> polling the crowd for the use of another open-source project that has
> the following main "features":
>
>
>
> (1)     Level 1 and 2 compliant. Optional features to be added when
> level 1 and 2 is fully compliant.
>
> (2)     SQL-only data store. To simplify the implementation, Hibernate
> or JPOX could be used. This takes care of online-backup, trasaction
> support and clustering of datastore.
>
> (3)     Transaction aware caching. Plugin support (ehcache, oscache and
> tangosol).
>
> (4)     Easy to configure with spring, especially spring 2.0.
>
>
>
> Is such an implementation needed? Anyone want to begin to work on such a
> project? Any other open-source implementations out there that supports
> clustering?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Sten Roger Sandvik

Reply via email to