[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-482?page=all ]

Jukka Zitting updated JCR-482:
------------------------------

        Fix Version/s: 1.1
    Affects Version/s: 0.9
                       1.0
                       1.0.1
                           (was: 1.1)

Good point.

The spec requires the "relevant mappings" to be included in the "top-most XML 
element", but in this case (concurrent introduction of new namespaces) I think 
it's better to include extra namespaces as local xmlns settings than to skip 
the elements or to use unknown prefixes.

I see two ways to fix this. One is the straightforward solution you mentioned 
of adding missing namespace mappings on the fly, and the other would be to 
block all changes to the namespace registry while an XML export is in progress.

> Should there be consensus for that change I'm happy to give it a try

Please do, patches are very much welcome! :-)

> DocViewSaxEventGenerator may generate non-NS-wellformed XML
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCR-482
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-482
>             Project: Jackrabbit
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: xml
>    Affects Versions: 1.0, 1.0.1, 0.9
>         Environment: n/a
>            Reporter: Julian Reschke
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.1
>
>
> The XML serialization code relies on the fact that all required prefix-to-uri 
> mappings are known beforehand (actually, when serializing the root node). So 
> there's an assumption that the permanent namespace registry will never change 
> during serialization, which may be incorrect when another client adds 
> namespace registrations while the XML export is in progress.
> To fix this, "addNamespacePrefixes" should ensure that namespace declarations 
> have been written for all prefixes used on the current node (node name + 
> properties), potentially going back to the namespace resolver when needed.
> (Should there be consensus for that change I'm happy to give it a try)

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to