El mar, 01-08-2006 a las 13:17 +0300, Jukka Zitting escribió: > Hi, > > On 8/1/06, Paco Avila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > And now which possibilites do I have? Is possible to implement an custom > > AccessManager actually? > > I suppose your problem is caused by Jackrabbit asking for permissions > on a node that hasn't yet been persisted, so you can't access it from > your AccessManager. I'm not sure how this is best handled, but one > workaround could be to just grant all permissions on such nodes. After > all the transient nodes are still completely controlled by that > session. >
Thanks, I was thinking in this workaround and I was not sure it was a good idea. I will try it and check for possible problems. Thanks again :) -- Paco Avila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
