Hi I am working on a backup and restore tool for Jackrabbit. It's why I need to escape all checks since I am writing protected node (for this reason).
What is your other idea about this please? BR Nicolas my blog! http://www.deviant-abstraction.net !! On 8/15/06, Stefan Guggisberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/14/06, Nicolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > In order to restore properly the content of a workspace, I needed to escape > some checks the regular WorkspaceImporter class was doing. I rewrote a > custom Importer with no problem. ( It's basically a copy/paste of the > current importer without the check: it's a short term solution for now but a > working one. We plan to implement a switch to escape all checks in JR > internal.) > > However, I couldn't do the same with the PropInfo class. Therefore I add to > add a restoreApply method, which is the same as apply but without the check. > Maybe I should rename it? I choose restoreApply to emphathise the fact that > it's reserved for the restore operation. without knowing exactly what you're up to, i doubt that this would be a good approach. it rather looks like a nasty hack... cheers stefan
