On 9/1/06, Dan Connelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The more I work with Graffito ocm the more I like it.   The code is
first-rate and deserves to leave incubation.


Damn... I have waited for a long time to hear this :-). Thanks.

However, the ocm code has very few dependencies on Jackrabbit.   Why is
it then to be a Jackrabbit sub-project?


I guess what is more important is that it is JCR API based. So,
Jackrabbit will offer an JCR implementation and tools to develop. Nice
combination, imo.

./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.

One can connect this ocm tool to a non-JR Content Repository with very
little  effort.

For that reason, I do not see Graffito ocm as a sub-project of
Jackrabbit (assuming "Jackrabbit" is the name of the repository
implementation).

At the risk of being pedantic, let me suggest to you the idea of an
Apache Content Repository Project, with Jackrabbit, OCM and CDNUtils
being co-equal sub-projects (in parallel with the Apache (R)DB Project
having Derby, JDO and DdUtils as its co-equal sub-projects).

    -- Dan



Reply via email to