Tobias Bocanegra wrote:
> Great, thanks. So it's basically a correspondence identifier, right?yes, exactly.why not rename it to CorrespondenceId then? since ItemId is also used inside jackrabbit core and might cause confusion.
sounds like a good idea.here's another related question that I'm not 100% sure of what the answer is:
what is the correspondence identifier of the root node if it is not referenceable?
regards marcel
