[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-647?page=comments#action_12454968 ] Julian Reschke commented on JCR-647: ------------------------------------
For the record: - I agree with Angela's analysis, and - I was wrong when I thought I say other related problems when the other checker methods; all of these were caused by my SPI implementation. > NodeType.canRemoveItem does not consider residual definitions (JCR2SPI) > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: JCR-647 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-647 > Project: Jackrabbit > Issue Type: Bug > Components: SPI > Reporter: Julian Reschke > Priority: Minor > Attachments: JCR-647.diff.txt > > > JCR2SPI's NodeType.canRemoveItem() doesn't seem to work with residual > definitions. This seems to be caused by > EffectiveNodeTyoeImpl.checkRemoveItemConstraints not checking the unnamed > definitions. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
