[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12476110
]
Marcel Reutegger commented on JCR-741:
--------------------------------------
I was thinking of a method that provides all the required information to
resolve the ambiguous definitions. Something along the lines: 'hey, you gave me
multiple matching property definitions when I wanted to create a property named
'foo', which one should I use?'
RepositoryService.resolvePropertyDefinition(SessionInfo sessionInfo, NodeInfo
nodeInfo, QName propertyName, QPropertyDefinition[] definitions)
And similar for node definitions.
> Handling of multiple residual prop defs in EffectiveNodeTypeImpl
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JCR-741
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-741
> Project: Jackrabbit
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: SPI
> Reporter: Julian Reschke
> Assigned To: Julian Reschke
> Priority: Minor
>
> org.apache.jackrabbit.jcr2spi.nodetype.EffectiveNodeTypeImpl currently
> rejects multiple residual property definitions, if they do not differ in
> getMultiple(). In fact, it should accept all combinations, so differing
> values for getOnParentVersionAction and other aspects should be accepted as
> well.
> See JSR 170, 6.7.8:
> "For purposes of the above, the notion of two definitions having the same
> name does not apply to two residual definitions. Two (or more) residual
> property or child node definitions with differing subattributes must be
> permitted to co-exist in the same effective node type. They are interpreted
> as disjunctive (ORed) options."
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
