[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12513245
]
Bertrand Delacretaz commented on JCR-388:
-----------------------------------------
I'm just saying that the patch is indeed in SVN format, the only slight problem
is that the pathnames are not relative to the jackrabbit root, for example:
---
C:/jprojects/eclipse/version_patch/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/server/io/DefaultIOManager.java
(revision 556115)
+++
C:/jprojects/eclipse/version_patch/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/server/io/DefaultIOManager.java
(working copy)
which should ideally be
jackrabbit-jcr-server/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/server/io/DefaultIOManager.java
This happens frequently depending on people's environments, and SVN clients (I
assume tortoise does this as well) have an option to ignore a certain number of
path elements when appliying patches.
So in my example, "patch -p4" means "ignore C:/jprojects/eclipse/version_patch
from the pathnames in the patch".
But apart from that the patch is IMHO fine.
> add support for RFC 3253 to the simple server
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JCR-388
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-388
> Project: Jackrabbit
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: webdav
> Affects Versions: 0.9
> Reporter: jeremi Joslin
> Assignee: angela
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: patch_16JUL07.txt, patch_16JUL07.zip, patch_rfc3253.zip,
> Review.txt, rfc.zip
>
>
> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3253.txt
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
