Felix Meschberger wrote:
I favour neither of both :-) I would favor a real node type management API, which would allow more fine grained control over the node type registration process (such an API will be coming with JCR 2).
I see ;) I definitely like to see this happening, but this sound like a rather big undertaken (which of course has to be done anyway for Jackrabbit 2.0).
But I still see the need for something like CND-based registration, because as you said it really eases starting up. It is helpful as well for registering default nodetypes which are not be managed by the application. It's much easier to maintenance a CND than some java code using an API.
What do you think of option two in my original mail, regardless of when the new nodetype management API is available?
Cheers, Christoph
