Thoughts?
On Aug 28, 2007, at 9:16 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Aug 27, 2007, at 11:16 PM, Thomas Mueller wrote:
Hi,
Yes, in my view, repository.xml and workspace.xml should go away
or at
least be less visible for a user. Or do you mean something else with
XML configuration?
I don't see why we would want to make configuration files less
visible to the users but that's for a different thread.
Currently, the way the JCR server is booted up is tightly
integrated w/ XML. For example, the repository configuration
object holds an XML snippet that it uses as a template to generate
new workspaces. This is what I mean by tight coupling.
Ideally, we would have factories. This gives me more control.
interceptor stacks
Could you provide an example?
The current architecture of Jackrabbit seems to be tightly coupled
with extensions being implemented via inheritance and overriding
certain methods. ATM, when I want to provide virtual properties to
a node, I have to inherit from an existing persistent manager (PM)
and override methods such as load(PropertyId).
I was thinking that a JCR is really like a CMP container. Having
worked on OpenEJB the use of interceptors immediately springs to
mind. We can provide all sorts of cross cutting behavior, e.g.
security, remoting, tx, by just inserting new interceptors.
Take my comments with a grain of salt; I don't fully grok the
architecture.
Regards,
Alan
