On 9/17/07, Stefan Guggisberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi martijn,
>
> On 9/17/07, Martijn Hendriks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The QName class does not do any validation on the syntax of the local
> > part. As a result, it is really easy to destroy your repository by
> > registration of a nodetype with, for instance, a property with QName
> > {http://myapp/a}local1:local2. The NodeTypeRegistry only validates the
> > prefix part on registration. The local part is validated when the
> > custom_nodetypes.xml are read in on a subsequent startup which will fail
> > because of the invalid name... (JR 1.3)
> >
> > The javadoc of the Qname constructor says explicitly that the format of
> > the local part is not validated and that the NameFormat class should be
> > used. Imo it would be good to validate the local part in both the
> > constructor and the valueOf method, or is there a reason not to do this?
>
> QName's are only heavily used internally and assumed to be syntacticallyerm, i meant: "heavily used and internally only" > correct. validations are intentionally avoided for performance reasons. > > cheers > stefan > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > Martijn > > > > -- > > > > Martijn Hendriks > > <GX> creative online development B.V. > > > > t: 024 - 3888 261 > > f: 024 - 3888 621 > > e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Wijchenseweg 111 > > 6538 SW Nijmegen > > http://www.gx.nl/ > > >
