Hi all, Given the growth of the number of more or less independent "top-level sub-projects" in Jackrabbit, we should probably start again thinking of having independent releases ?
For example, I could imagine, that OCM has definitely a different release cycle than core which in turn might have a different cycle than webdav. Regards Felix Am Donnerstag, den 20.09.2007, 10:24 +0530 schrieb ruchi goel: > Jukka Zitting wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 9/11/07, ruchi goel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> What is the expected time frame for release of Jackrabbit 1.4 ? > >> > > > > I don't yet have any exact dates, but I'd expect at least a month or > > two before the release is ready. At least we still need to finalize > > the data store implementation and handle the upgrades of the OCM and > > SPI components. I'll come up with a more detailed release plan with > > relevant Jira references in near future. > > > > Is there interest in getting some essential bug fixes out already > > before the 1.4 release? I could easily imagine doing a 1.3.2 patch > > release if there's interest. > > > > BR, > > > > Jukka Zitting > > > Yes, we are deeply interested in an interim release since we were > dependent on Graffito's OCM layer earlier. Now since it is part of > Jackrabbit , we will be depending on a Jackrabbit release to be > bundled in our product. > > Is 1.4 release on hold because of the bugs mentioned in the mail chain > ( with the same subject). > > Thanks, > Ruchi
