Hi, On 9/20/07, KÖLL Claus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > so my opinion is it should be regardless which peristence manager you use > jackrabbit should be always transactional if a operation runs inside a > transaction > context. is this true or not ?
You need to have a persistence manager that can store the transaction changelog as a single atomic operation, which as of now means the database persistence managers. An underlying database transaction is still needed for that atomic change, but it's not a part of the externally managed transaction context. BR, Jukka Zitting
