Dominique Pfister wrote:
Hi Paco
On 08/09/2007, Paco Avila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry, I missunderstood the code because confused "lock holder" and
"lock ownser" concepts :(
You're not the only one ;) "Lock owner" should rather have been named
"lock creator", the current term is absolutely misleading!
btw. for that reason that has been changed in jsr283:
quote from '6.9.4 Lock Owner' of the spec available for
public review:
"If the lock is open-scoped and its ownership is later switched to
another session, the jcr:lockOwner property is automatically changed
accordingly. In implementations that support simultaneous lock
ownership, the behavior of jcr:lockOwner on the addition of an owner is
implementation specific."
regards
angela
