Why not to create a new jackrabbit contrib ? Concerning OCM, I would like to implement an implicit mapping which will not require annotation or mapping file.
Christophe On 10/23/07, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > The current OCM require existing Java classes when mapping JCR content > to Java objects. This introduces a relatively high entry barrier for > various scripting environments, where you just want access to JavaBean > properties as name-value pairs without having to set up explicit > content mappings. > > To make life easier for such environments I'd like to propose > implementing a JCR binding for the DynaBean concept [1] in Commons > BeanUtils. > > [1] > http://commons.apache.org/beanutils/commons-beanutils-1.7.0/docs/api/org/apache/commons/beanutils/package-summary.html#dynamic > > BR, > > Jukka Zitting >
