Hi. I think the issue I mentioned in http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg08520.html could be solved by integrating the data store with the current save mechanism, so when you do a save, you also get an atomic update on the timestamps of the transient items in the data store cache. And by synchronizing this update and the deletion of of unsaved items, I think we could avoid that scenario. What do you think?
Regards, Esteban Franqueiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it.
