[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12540178
]
Dominique Pfister commented on JCR-1087:
----------------------------------------
Hi Martijn,
your patch looks good to me, so please go ahead and submit it. One nice thing
that might be required for people already owning a database journal: is there a
way to easily detect whether the LOCAL_REVISIONS table is missing and to tell
the user to upgrade their schema?
Cheers
Dominique
> Maintain the cluster revision table
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: JCR-1087
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1087
> Project: Jackrabbit
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: clustering
> Affects Versions: 1.3
> Environment: A clustered Jackrabbit
> Reporter: Martijn Hendriks
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: cluster-trace.txt, JCR-1087.patch
>
>
> The revision table in which cluster nodes write their changes can potentially
> become very large. If all cluster nodes are up to date to a certain revision
> number, then it seems unnecessary to keep the revisions with a lower number.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
