> > Hi, > > On Nov 28, 2007 12:09 PM, Julian Reschke > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It's definitively non-trivial to get it sort-of working; > reaching full > > compliance with the DAV:basicsearch may be impossible
I kind of had that feeling already.. :-) > (unless by > > bypassing JCR's search). > Jukka Zitting wrote: > And that's where the suggested "Lucene" search language comes in... Yes, but is the lucene search language not already sort of present by what Marcel wrote: "your syntax implementation just need to transform a string statement into a org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.QueryNode tree" It might be, that I would need to add another QueryNode impl because some search from basic-search cannot be accounted for yet. But, using this QueryNode tree garantuees me that I am independant of the actual lucene indexing. Regards Ard > > BR, > > Jukka Zitting >
