Hi, On Dec 10, 2007 4:40 PM, Esteban Franqueiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry to insist, but I never got an answer to my previuos email about this.
No problem. I was offline for the past week, vacationing in China. > What about JCR-314, 935 (which you mentioned) and 1148, issues related with > the > fine grained locking? We've been testing the fix I proposed for JCR-1148 in > the > JCR-935 comments for some time now and haven't had any NPE due to it. I'm not sure how ready we are to switch to fine grained locking as the default SISM locking strategy. From a feature perspective it would be really nice, but I'm a bit worried about stability especially since we finally seem to have overcome the infamous concurrent versioning problems. BR, Jukka Zitting
