Hi, On Jan 21, 2008 4:38 PM, Ard Schrijvers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jukka Zitting wrote: > > That's pretty bleeding edge, I learned about it from Michael > > Busch during the last ApacheCon. See the reference on the > > last page of his presentation [1]. AFAIK it's not there yet > > but neither is NGP, so I'm hoping that by the time NGP does > > proper indexing that feature will be available. > > I am trying to understand what benefit you are aiming at: AFAIU (from > the presentation and some email threads) the payload is used to store > some extra info along with a term (currently). The per-document payload > is a future feature?
Yes. I don't know when it's due in Lucene but once it's there, you should be able to store _and update_ payload data associated with a document. > Am I correct in that you are aiming at storing and searching the path > efficiently by using Payload? Yes. > > > reusing an already indexed and analyzed document might be a handy > > > lucene feature anyway. > > > > Agreed. Perhaps something to follow up with the Lucene guys. > > I'll ask on the lucene user-list and see wether I get some input. Cool, thanks! BR, Jukka Zitting
