My main problem with SPI is that if I return depth=1 results from getItemInfos 
(a NodeInfo for each subfolder), JCR2SPI ends up subsequently calling 
getChildInfos anyway, to find out what ALL the children are, regardless of the 
fact that I just returned what all the children are in my GetItemInfos response.

>From JCR2SPI's point of view, the problem seems to be that it had no way of 
>knowing whether I returned SOME, or ALL, of the subfolders. In that sense, 
>it's the Iterator return value types that I have a problem with. I would 
>prefer returning a container, that could encapsulate the Iterator, but also 
>allow for declaring formalized hints, and maybe even out-of-band data that 
>JCR2SPI chooses to look at as hints.

And the hint JCR2SPI needs from getItemInfos is "response includes all 
children" (or "this response contains depth=1 results").

It would also not hurt for depth=0 results to be able to return the equivalent 
of IMAP's \HasChildren flag. Because in that case, getItemInfos could return 
depth=0 results, and then in the case where there are no children, JCR2SPI 
could avoid the unnecessary getChildInfos when there are no results.

David
-----Original Message-----
From: Marcel Reutegger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 2/7/2008 3:49 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: SPI caching, was: [jira] Resolved: (JCR-1361) Lock test assumes 
that changes in one session are immediately visible in different session
 
Julian Reschke wrote:
> I think I understand batch read, and how JCR2SPI would use that. What I 
> don't see how it helps in this case.
> 
> An SPI implementation *could* return ItemInfos for all children when the 
> NodeInfo for a collection is fetched, but how would it know that anybody 
> wants to see the members?

Angela and I discussed this some time ago and we decided that for now we leave 
to up to the implementation. basically for simplicity. See also javadoc 
RepositoryService.getItemInfos().

 
Visit Synchronica at GSMA Mobile World Congress, Barcelona, 11-14 Feb, Hall 2, 
Booth #2J25
 
 

Reply via email to