[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12587767#action_12587767
]
Christophe Lombart commented on JCR-1339:
-----------------------------------------
I just commited a better support for the Map, there are 2 ways to define a Map
attributes :
Class A
{
// For unparametrized Map, it is mandatory to define the elementClassName
@Collection (elementClassName=Element.class) Map map1;
// For parametized Map, the elementClassName is not necessay
@Collection private Map<String, MyClass> map2;
}
Furthermore, The class ManageableMap is used only internally by the OCM
framework.
> ManageableCollectionUtil doesn't support Maps
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JCR-1339
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1339
> Project: Jackrabbit
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: jackrabbit-ocm
> Affects Versions: 1.4
> Reporter: Aidan O'Loan
> Assignee: Christophe Lombart
> Fix For: 1.5
>
> Attachments: ManageableCollectionUtil_JCR-1339.txt
>
> Original Estimate: 24h
> Remaining Estimate: 24h
>
> ManageableCollectionUtil has two getManageableCollection methods, which do
> not currently return a ManageableCollection which wraps Maps.
> ManagedHashMap already exists in the codebase which I assume was created for
> this purpose, so both getManageableCollection methods could be modified so
> that they do something like:
> if (object instanceof Map){
> return new ManagedHashMap((Map)object);
> }
> An alternative solution might be to modify the JCR mapping to support
> explicitly defining the 'ManagedXXX' class.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
