Hi, On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 1:21 AM, Tobias Bocanegra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > oh, i didn't realize this neither...so in this case i'm rather against > this release. > if it's not too late, i would vote -1 and remove this method from the > interface again, but leave it in the abstract pm. so users could cast > to abstract pm if they need it.
The release was already pushed out to the central Maven repository and pulling it back would be a bit troublesome. How about if we treated this as a regression and fixed it ASAP (next week) in 1.4.4? BR, Jukka Zitting
