I have a question regarding best practices. According to the Jackrabbit documentation JNDI is preferred over RMI for performance reasons. However, I've noticed many Jackrabbit users still opt to use RMI. I understand RMI can be used in remote situations where JNDI cannot be used but other then that what is the tradeoff if any between RMI and JNDI? Historically, I understand RMI is slower then JNDI but does that paradigm still stand or has RMI performance increased enough to be comparable to JNDI? specifically when dealing with large Jackrabbit repositories?
Thanks for any insight Kris -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/RMI-vs.-JNDI-tp17876722p17876722.html Sent from the Jackrabbit - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
