On 8/5/08, Marcel Reutegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > does anyone remember why ItemStates are serializable? It seems they are > never actually serialized directly. Instead we use the Serializer utility > class that serializes the individual parts an ItemState consists of. > > maintaining backward compatibility for serializable classes is quite > painful. If we don't actually use it I suggest we drop it.
+1
