[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christophe Lombart resolved JCR-1784.
-------------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
The patch has been applied. thanks and well done ! it was a nice bug :-)
I didn't modify the class AbstractMapperImpl. For me, this modification is not
necessary.
I also added unit tests for the annotation support.
Let me know if something is wrong.
> OCM:The UUID of the collection elements changes on update.
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JCR-1784
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1784
> Project: Jackrabbit
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: jackrabbit-ocm
> Affects Versions: 1.5
> Reporter: Boni Gopalan
> Assignee: Christophe Lombart
> Fix For: 1.5
>
> Attachments: JCR-1784.bonigopalan.patch
>
> Original Estimate: 3h
> Remaining Estimate: 3h
>
> On ocm.update transaction, the Current implementation of
> DefaultCollectionConverterImpl recreates the colleciton-element nodes if
> there is no id field specificaiton. This is completely valid for majority of
> the cases. But I came across a case where the colleciton element has a uuid
> field. In this case also what is happening with the current implementation
> is that it drops all the elements from the old collection-elements and
> recreates the new ones. The major flip side is that now I am left with brand
> new UUIDs. I think we should address the uniqueness characteristics
> specified through UUID also while mapping colleciton elements.
> I have a patch and a TestCase to verify the same. I have implemented it only
> for the digester. If people feel the approach is right I will work out an
> annotation based testcase as well. I do not think it is going to fail even
> with annotations.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
