Not really. The PROPFIND directive is called "allprop", and I'm just
using
camel case to put the words "is invisible in allprop" together.
Well it's inconsistent with PROPFIND_ALL_PROP
PROPFIND_ALL_PROP was from me. the additional _ isn't julians fault...
Does it need to be consistent with it? Why?
If you feel strongly about it, go ahead and change it. All I'm saying is
that I choose that particular spelling by purpose.
same for me. thomas, feel free to change either variant
or open an issue...
if you prefer to change PROPFIND_ALL_PROP to PROPFIND_ALLPROP
(and ev. the related constants), i would like you to deprecate the
old one and add new constants.
thanks
angela
