Hi, > extended the Value interface instead of InputStream.
That would work as well: JackrabbitValue. > if we make it like you wrote ... > every module must handle this internally. Yes. The modules can use standard JCR event listeners, so they are backward compatible and implementation independent. > it would be much finer to handle this more generic with a proxy in front of > 'modules'. > such proxy could store the dataIdentifier/result and a module key and if we > try > to process a binary a second time this proxy could check this and return > without calling > the module a second time. If you do that, you need to define a new API. Could you describe your solution in more detail? Not all modules have the exact same requirements, we should make sure the solution is flexible enough. Regards, Thomas
