Hi all, On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 9:36 AM, David Nuescheler <[email protected]> wrote: > since i think it should also be a goal of this implementation to > make our code as re-uable as possible, it is great that it does > not have any specific proprietary jackrabbit dependencies but > really just jcr dependencies. on top of that i think it would also > be great to expose the entire cmis model as a separate api.
Yes, this is what we were thinking about, as well; thinking of naming it 'model'. So let's go with the 'api' one; I totally agree. > i would like to take that a step further and also propose that we > have a cmis client. i think this is something that is really important > and help everybody developing something around cmis a great > deal. > so. i would propose that we have an svn subproject structure > that is something like this. I think that the client subproject could be structured as a sort of TCK for our server implementation; in that case it should be structured to support generic functionalities and could be, one day, a useful tool for other implementations. WDYT? -- Paolo Mottadelli: http://www.paolomottadelli.com Sourcesense - making sense of Open Source: http://www.sourcesense.com
