Hi, On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Alexander Klimetschek <[email protected]> wrote: > Not sure if we'd rather keep the Jackrabbit reference here, since the > JCR commons is still part of the Jackrabbit project.
There are quite a few subprojects at Apache that have their own org.apache package name: Solr, Derby, HttpClient, jSieve, etc. > That would also be backwards-compatible. Agreed. > The main indicator would then be the 4th part in the package name, > not sure if this one is consisten across the components that go into > jcr commons (that could IMHO be "o.a.jackrabbit.jcr"). If we keep org.apache.jackrabbit as the package root, then I'd rather not introduce an extra package level. Each JCR Commons component would just keep it's own reserved package name, like the current org.apache.jackrabbit.rmi for JCR-RMI. BR, Jukka Zitting
