Jukka Zitting schrieb: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Felix Meschberger <[email protected]> wrote: >> Looks good so far. But I would also modify the jackrabbit projects to >> refer to the latest released jcr-rmi artifact instead of to the >> 1.6-SNAPSHOT one. > > I'd rather do that with JCR-RMI 2.0 released from JCR Commons (which I > hope to do pretty soon once the dust settles), but I wouldn't mind > going with 1.5.0 either. > >> Likewise I strongly suggest to revert to using the latest releases >> jackrabbit-jcr-commons in the Jackrabbit project until jcr-commons 2.0 >> is released. And so forth for the rest of the new commons projects. > > Agreed. I tried doing that, but unfortunately the current JCR-RMI > trunk doesn't compile with jcr-commons 1.5.0 due to some recent > JSR-283 changes. We'll need to resolve that somehow.
Ui ! I fear the rmi project is not really independent of Jackrabbit, since it supports the additional Jackrabbit API, hence the dependencies, probably. Regards Felix
