Hi, That would be great! I believe we should have an in-memory persistence manager (for unit tests) and the bundle db persistence managers. I'm not sure about the bundle fs pm.
Regards, Thomas On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Jukka Zitting <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to drop all our non-bundle persistence managers before we > release Jackrabbit 2.0. > > Besides forcing people to upgrade to the recommended setup, getting > rid of the old PMs would also allow us to evolve the > PersistenceManager interface to better match the architectural changes > (bundle storage, data store, clustering, etc.) that we've gone through > during the Jackrabbit 1.x cycle. > > WDYT? > > BR, > > Jukka Zitting >
