[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12713507#action_12713507
]
angela commented on JCR-2122:
-----------------------------
yes... but the problem is not fixed by moving the classes. the problem was
located in spi2jcr QPropertyDefinition as well...
i was looking at it... but now have a conflict.... hm....
in general: if the hudson builds for spi-related stuff fail, i will take a look
at it (unless i'm off). why don't you let me know, when you
want to fix it? it's only 10 meters, isn't it?
> Use ValueConstraint from spi-commons in core
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JCR-2122
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2122
> Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: jackrabbit-core, jackrabbit-spi-commons
> Reporter: Jukka Zitting
> Assignee: Jukka Zitting
> Priority: Minor
>
> There is quite a lot of duplication between the ValueConstraint classes in
> core and spi-commons. It would be better to maintain just a single copy of
> this functionality, so I'd like to change jackrabbit-core to use the classes
> from spi-commons as much as possible.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
