2009/6/6 Dominik Süß <[email protected]>: > Thanks for this hint. > So I propably should think about handling this search without lucene and use > jcr-api for it or combine it (for the tagging information which should be > correct and should be used since there is no real navigation since the > coupling for this way of tagging is based on lose references). > I did hope I could use the lucene index for all of it to have a better > performance but I think it's worth trying it the other way - now I have to > figure out how to combine "my" score with the lucene score.
IMHO there are a number of interesting use cases which require deeper semantic indexing FYI jackrabbit is participating in http://www.iks-project.eu/ (which is now open to a wider community) so that might be of interest - robert
