Stefan Guggisberg wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Mike Wilson wrote: > > What is planned for Jackrabbit 2.0 regarding nodetype > > management? Ie, regarding these features from chapter 19 in > > the JCR 2.0 spec: > > - Removing a node type from the registry. > > - Updating the definition of a registered node type that is > > currently in use as the node type of a node in the > > repository. > > > > Will these be "fully" implemented to handle all sorts of > > situations, or will implementation be similar to Jackrabbit > > 1.x with no unregister and only limited updates? > > AFAIK there are currently no plans for further work on the node type > management features you mentioned, at least not so for jackrabbit 2.0. > so far we haven't reached consensus on how to best tackle the > implementation challenges we're facing but we'll certainly > address this topic > when desiging the jackrabbit 3.0 core architecture.
Thanks for the info, Stefan. I take it that 3.0 is several years away? (Btw, are there any JSR-283 folks here that know if there are other JCR implementations doing this earlier?) Best regards Mike
