Alfresco is pretty feature rich. It has CMS and WCM features. However, if you are sole interest is in JSR 170 or JSR 283 I would recommend you avoid Alfresco. At present their JSR 170 implementation is functional, but certainly does not comply with all the JSR 170 optionals. Furthermore, JSR 170 is not a central... or to be quite honest, even well maintained bit of functionality for alfresco. Where as, JCR is primary concern for Jackrabbit since it is the reference implementation.
Lennard Fuller ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paco Avila" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2009 10:36:53 AM GMT -07:00 U.S. Mountain Time (Arizona) Subject: Re: Jackrabbit Vs Alfresco Jackrabbit is the reference implementation of JCR-170. It's a framework not an CMS. Alfresco has its own implementation of JCR-170. You can compare Alfresco with OpenKM (anr document managemen system built-on jackrabbit. On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Dhananjay Mahajan < [email protected] > wrote: Hi All, Can you please send across the detail feature list of Jackrabbit Vs Alfresco ? As both are open source , this comparison will help to decide the CMS. Regards Dhananjay Mahajan ============================================================================================================================ Disclaimer: This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential and subject to the Tech Mahindra policy statement, you may review the policy at http://www.techmahindra.com/Disclaimer.html externally and http://tim.techmahindra.com/Disclaimer.html internally within Tech Mahindra. ============================================================================================================================ -- Paco Avila GIT Consultors tel: +34 971 498310 fax: +34 971496189 e-mail: [email protected] http://www.git.es
