Hi, On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Angela Schreiber <[email protected]> wrote: > i wouldn't be in favor of such a move.
How about an alternative of merging just jcr2spi to spi-commons and leaving spi2jcr as a separate component like spi2dav? This would support the long term goal of getting rid of the separate transient space implementations in core and jcr2spi, as it would be easier for core to reuse stuff from jcr2spi. And in other cases; a spi2something client needs both spi-commons and jcr2spi for JCR API access to the SPI backend. Having them as a single dependency would simplify things and even allow the spi2something jar to contain a RepositoryFactory (and Repository) class that clients can use directly without needing a yet another dependency like jcr-client. BR, Jukka Zitting
