> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Jukka Zitting <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Assuming we have a unified persistence layer (see the other thread), >> it should be possible to implement a relatively simple repository >> "microkernel" that implements just enough functionality for higher >> level components like search, versioning, node types, observation, >> etc. to be implemented on top of it.
+1 On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:50, Stefan Guggisberg <[email protected]> wrote: > absolutely. the SPI would IMO be an ideal starting point for such a > microkernel api. we might need to review/strip it though. +1 I think we should start with a scalable persistence layer (as discussed in the other threads) and from there find the simplest API needed for it, and then merge it with the existing SPI. An important goal for that microkernel API would be that you can implement it within one day (functionally, not necessarily fast), as compared with the full JCR API, that requires many things like node types, observation, shareable nodes, versioning etc. Regards, Alex -- Alexander Klimetschek [email protected]
