Hi, On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 13:34, Felix Meschberger <[email protected]> wrote: > But yes, dynamic "replacement" of persistence managers is definitely one > of the dynamic points -- if JR3 will still have persistence managers ...
could you please elaborate on this? I always though that's exactly the part of the repository that does not need dynamic replacement. I guess you don't mean to replace a persistence manager (or micro-kernel, or whatever it will be called in JR3) on runtime and switch it from a DB based to a file based one, right? regards marcel
