Hi, > I don't see the point of doing such steps after the transaction has already > been committed.
Well, because you don't have a callback mechanism that gets called _before_ committing (or reading, in the case of security). > I'd make node type constraints and security checks the responsibility > of the client who commits the transaction. That's a solution :-) I'm not sure it's the _right_ solution, but we can start like that. Regards, Thomas
