On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 15:03, Jukka Zitting <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Thomas Müller <[email protected]> wrote: >> I would like to define a new storage format for nodes and properties. > > More generally, I'd like to raise the bundle abstraction to a higher > level. As a first step I'd make the PersistenceManager interface aware > of bundles (i.e. load and store bundles instead of individual node and > property states), and later perhaps replace the item state concept > with bundle states to reduce the number of objects we need to keep > track of.
+1 I like that idea. regards marcel > We might also consider not storing each bundle in a separate record, > instead making a single record of all the bundles included in a > ChangeLog instance. Such super-bundles could perhaps be persisted in > the data store. > >> == Name and Namespace Index == >> [...] >> == Commonly Used String == > > +1 > > BR, > > Jukka Zitting >
