Yes, exactly. Many thanks.
-----Original Message----- From: Justin Edelson [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 12 April 2010 15:38 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Jackrabbit 1.6.0 Write Performance This looks like https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2579 ? On 4/12/10 9:25 AM, [email protected] wrote: > Thomas > > We still hit problems when we attempted to add nodes, concurrently, to > existing nodes (I think the message was something like "attempting to update > a node that is already being updated"). We had to lock the node, update, and > then release. > > Regards > > George > > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Müller [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 12 April 2010 12:57 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Jackrabbit 1.6.0 Write Performance > > Hi, > >> With regard to concurrency, are there any plans for jackrabbit to support >> concurrency out of the box? > > If you use one session for each thread then it should already work. > It's a bug if it doesn't. > > In any case I would use one session per thread, no matter if a future version > of Jackrabbit supports it or not. > > Regards, > Thomas
