Hi As much as I understand that we should push JR 3 forward, I agree with Angela's position.
I don't think that adding JR3 as a techno preview in upcoming JR 2 will do any good -- except making the release process and understanding the code even more complex. Regards Felix On 14.05.2010 08:25, Angela Schreiber wrote: > hi jukka > >> Thomas has done some nice work with the jackrabbit-j3 prototype in the >> sandbox. To make this codebase easily available to other developers >> and to allow better reuse of existing Jackrabbit code and integration >> with things like jackrabbit-standalone, I propose that we move the >> component from the sandbox to Jackrabbit trunk. This means that the >> component would be included as a technology preview in future 2.x >> releases and that we'd include it in our normal continuous integration >> builds. The downside is the increased build time in trunk. > > not sure... i have the impression that it is too early to move > the prototype out of the sandbox. > > and i don't fully understand your arguments for the move: reuse > of existing code is achieved by adding dependencies to other > modules in either way, isn't it? and furthermore, i don't understand > why a sandbox project wasn't easily available... my criteria for a > move into trunk would rather be: this prototype isn't a prototype any > more and we feel comfortable to include it into your regular release > cycle. > > regards > angela > >> WDYT? >> >> BR, >> >> Jukka Zitting >> > >
