[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2625?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12868126#action_12868126
]
Stefan Guggisberg commented on JCR-2625:
----------------------------------------
> I was wondering if it makes sense to build the StringCache right into the
> NameFactoryImpl, instead of using it before each call to getQName() ? Other
> modules might also benefit from such an optimization. WDYT?
yes, maybe. however, i prefered to keep the scope of the changes for this issue
local.
using StringCache in NameFactoryImpl should IMO be proposed in a separate
issue as it might cause unwanted side-effects (just my gut feeling ;)
> spi2davex: reduce memory footprint of Node/PropertyInfoImpl
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JCR-2625
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2625
> Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: jackrabbit-spi-commons, jackrabbit-spi2dav
> Reporter: Stefan Guggisberg
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: leaner_item_info_objects.patch
>
>
> the in-memory footprint of o.a.jackrabbit.spi2davex.NodeinfoImpl &
> PropertyInfoImp is quite big.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
