[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2714?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12898221#action_12898221
]
Michael Dürig commented on JCR-2714:
------------------------------------
Thanks Jukka. This looks good to me. Although I'd prefer to have the
performUnchecked method on SessionState I think your solution is better since
it doesn't require to expose ItemValidator's state.
> Selective disabling of checks in ItemValidator
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JCR-2714
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2714
> Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: jackrabbit-core
> Affects Versions: 2.2.0
> Reporter: Michael Dürig
> Assignee: Michael Dürig
> Attachments: JCR-2714-2.patch, JCR-2714.patch
>
>
> I would like to be able to selectively disable checks in ItemValidator in the
> scope of an operation performed through methods of the SessionState class.
> Doing so would provide simple means for internally modifying (for example)
> protected items. Currently such modifications must be done 'manually' on the
> item state level. This approach is very error prone and not very DRY.
> With my upcoming patch in place, setting a protected property would look like
> this:
> final Node parent = ...
> final Value value = ...
> SessionState sessionState = sessionContext.getSessionState();
> Property property = sessionState.performUnchecked(new
> SessionOperation<Property>() {
> public Property perform(SessionContext context) throws
> RepositoryException {
> return parent.setProperty("foo", value);
> }
> }, ItemValidator.CHECK_CONSTRAINTS);
> That is, users need to have access to the session context in order to disable
> checks which makes this only usable from inside Jackrabbit.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
