I create a copy of a jackrabbit repository with org.apache.jackrabbit.core.RepositoryCopier (using org.apache.jackrabbit.core.persistence.pool.DerbyPersistenceManager).
Trying to access this copy with org.apache.jackrabbit.core.persistence.db.DerbyPersistenceManager fails. Testcase: 1) create a repository.xml file with org.apache.jackrabbit.core.persistence.pool.DerbyPersistenceManager 2) start/stop jackrabbit 3) change repository.xml to org.apache.jackrabbit.core.persistence.db.DerbyPersistenceManager 4) start jackrabbit I don't understand why pooled access should yield different persisted data... Bug or feature? Regards Clemens
