Hey Fabrizio,
Great, thanks !
-g
On 10 Feb 2011, at 21:09, Fabrizio Giustina wrote:
> Hi,
> I found out the solution by myself some time after my question: yes,
> there is already a better replacement, which is the standard bundle
> filesytem persistence manager.
>
> There is a way to set it up using a memory filesystem... looks like
> it's not really well documented, but after some digging into
> jackrabbit sources I found out that setting the obscure
> "blobFSBlockSize" property to 1 does the trick (not sure what the
> value should mean, but I found out in the code that the value = 1 make
> the persistence manager use the filesystem configured in the xml
> config instead of a local filesystem).
>
> This is a full working config that uses an in-memory
> BundleFsPersistenceManager:
>
> <Workspace name="${wsp.name}">
> <FileSystem class="org.apache.jackrabbit.core.fs.mem.MemoryFileSystem">
> </FileSystem>
> <PersistenceManager
> class="org.apache.jackrabbit.core.persistence.bundle.BundleFsPersistenceManager">
> <param name="blobFSBlockSize" value="1" /><!-- store in memory -->
> </PersistenceManager>
> <SearchIndex class="org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.SearchIndex">
> [...]
> <param name="directoryManagerClass"
> value="org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.directory.RAMDirectoryManager"
> />
> <FileSystem class="org.apache.jackrabbit.core.fs.mem.MemoryFileSystem">
> </FileSystem>
> </SearchIndex>
> </Workspace>
>
>
> cheers
> fabrizio
>
>
>
> 2011/2/10 Grégory Joseph <[email protected]>:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> Same question as Fabrizio below - is there an alternative, or any plan to
>> have a non-deprecated InMemPersistenceManager ?
>> (As long as it works, I shouldn't care much about the deprecatedness, but
>> it's just clogging the logs, so I'd rather be sure I can really shunt those
>> logs down during tests)
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> -g
>>
>> On 27 Dec 2010, at 20:35, Fabrizio Giustina wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> after the deprecation of non-bundle persistence managers in 2.2 also
>>> the memory-only implementation
>>> (org.apache.jackrabbit.core.persistence.mem.InMemPersistenceManager)
>>> has been deprecated and its usage generates leads to a few warnings in
>>> the log.
>>>
>>> I am currently using the in-memory pm mainly for testing, and I can't
>>> see any alternative, non deprecated implementation in the 2.2
>>> release... is the removal of the memory PM intentional? Any plan for
>>> adding a "bundle" implementation?
>>>
>>>
>>> thanks
>>> fabrizio
>>
>>
>>
