[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13004454#comment-13004454
 ] 

Jukka Zitting commented on JCR-2910:
------------------------------------

OK, fair enough.

Since the feature is already as User.isAdmin() and if I understood correctly 
this functionality is only needed for a fairly limited set of uses, would a 
utility method as suggested by Felix be more appropriate here? Adding a new 
public API method just for convenience is fine if it saves thousands of lines 
of repetitive client code, but I'd rather put it in a shared utility method if 
we're talking about just a few dozens of instances where this functionality is 
used.


> Please add JackrabbitSession.isAdmin()
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCR-2910
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2910
>             Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Thomas Mueller
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Currently finding out if the session user is an admin requires:
> JackrabbitSession js = (JackrabbitSession) session;
> User user = ((User) js.getUserManager().getAuthorizable(session.getUserID()));
> boolean isAdmin = user.isAdmin();
> Or: ((SessionImpl) session).isAdmin(). However casting to an implementation 
> is problematic for several reasons.
> I think it would make sense to add isAdmin() to the JackrabbitSession 
> interface, so the code above would be:
> ((JackrabbitSession) session).isAdmin()

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to